2013 Resident Satisfaction Survey
2 Sep 2013, 9:34 AM
Many District residents recently took up the opportunity to express their opinion on Councils’ service delivery and overall performance by means of a Resident Satisfaction Survey conducted by telephone interview in July.
The Survey was carried out to test whether or not actual WDC service delivery stacked up against a range of specific performance targets established by Council for the 2013 Financial Year. Overall the results are excellent with all but one performance target being achieved this year.
The following summarizes the views of those residents who took part in the Survey on the services provided by Council.
The reliability of various reticulated water supply services received a rating of 94 percent resident satisfaction (6% dissatisfied). While 58 percent of residents were satisfied with the quality of drinking water (42% dissatisfied). Only one of these results achieves the target of 75% resident satisfaction.
The Solid Waste Management services performed well in this year’s survey with all four targets being achieved for this activity. The survey revealed that 94 percent of residents were satisfied with the safety of the recycling facilities (6% dissatisfied). The provision of effective waste transfer stations to the rural community was also rated highly with a satisfaction result of 80 percent (20% dissatisfied). The safety of the District wide network of refuse transfer stations was also considered to be very good with 95 percent satisfied (5% dissatisfied). The safety of the District’s landfill facility was given a rating of 93 percent satisfaction (7% dissatisfied).
The performance targets for other Council services were all achieved as follows:
Community Service | |
Parks and reserves |
89% satisfaction (11% dissatisfied)
|
Pool facility and service |
81% satisfaction (19% dissatisfied)
|
Arts and Culture facilities and service |
83% satisfaction (17% dissatisfied)
|
Public Toilets |
81% satisfied, 19% dissatisfied
|
Cemeteries |
95% satisfied, 5% dissatisfied
|
Library facilities and service |
95% satisfied, 5% dissatisfied
|
Regulation and Safety | |
Animal Control Service |
71% satisfied, 29% dissatisfied
|
Environmental Health |
92% satisfied, 8% dissatisfied
|
Building Consent and Control |
81% satisfied, 19% dissatisfied
|
Perceptions of Safety and Emergency Preparedness | |
Emergency Preparedness Residents who stated that they could survive for at least three days. |
70% prepared, 30% unprepared
|
Environmental Health Service |
92% satisfied, 8% dissatisfied
|
Building Consent and Control Service |
81% satisfied, 19% dissatisfied
|
Council | |
Providing effective and useful Council communications |
80% satisfied, 20% unprepared
|
The following measures do not have any targets attributed to them. | |
Council’s Financial Management | 58% satisfied, 42% dissatisfied |
Council’s Efficiency | 65% satisfied, 35% dissatisfied |
Council’s capability and competency | 75% satisfied, 25% dissatisfied |
Council’s Overall performance | 79% satisfied, 21% dissatisfied |